LemonCrow for Enterprise

Unlock your team's AI innovation

Hyper optimise context for cost and control

AI coding unlocks innovation like never before. But more AI usage means more cost and chaos. LemonCrow hyper optimises agent context for cost and control, without losing accuracy or security. Maximising the innovation you get out of your AI spend.

Works with
Claude Code
Codex
Opencode
Cursor
LemonCode

๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ญ Developed in Switzerland

How it works

How 30-65% cost savings and 25% increase in speed are achieved

Context, turns, and control. Get those right and your engineers finish more real work per session, at a lower cost.

Context

Only select the right input

Every extra file, log, or dead-end search sits in the conversation and gets paid for again. LemonCrow only feeds the agent what the task actually needs.

Turns

Minimising turns

Most delay isn't one big prompt, it's the agent going back and forth, re-reading what it already saw. Fewer turns means tasks actually finish, faster.

Control

Insights in what's working

Leaders need to know AI usage is turning into shipped work, not just trust that it is. That visibility sits across every team and repo, so scaling AI is a decision you can back up, not a leap of faith.

For Enterprise

Built for teams, not just developers

Everything in the free version, plus what a company actually needs to run this safely at scale.

Featured

Usage & outcomes dashboard

Exact output, usage, and cost, broken down by model, developer, and project.

See it below โ†“
Scale

No repo size limits

Index and search your biggest monorepos with no caps on symbols or files.

Shared

Shared team context

One code graph and memory layer for the whole team, every agent starts from the same understanding of your codebase.

Access

Role-based permissions

Control exactly who can read, write, or manage shared memory and project context.

Compliance

Governance policies + audit export

Set the rules once. Export a clean record any time you need to show how AI usage is being managed.

Trust

Retention controls + SSO

Data lifecycle and login both follow your company's existing policies, not a separate standard.

Security

Your code never leaves your machines

Parsing, indexing, and retrieval all run on-device, on your own hardware. There's no new destination for your source and no proxying of model traffic. The same model and provider your agents already use, nothing new to route through or trust.

Visibility, not guesswork

See what your AI investment is actually producing

Tasks finished, turns per task, time saved, and what it cost to get there. LemonCrow already tracks this per developer, locally, with LemonCrow session stats. Enterprise puts it on one dashboard for the whole org, by model, by developer, by project.

ModelOutputTurnsCost
Claude Sonnet 4.64,120$1,840
GPT-5.11,860$960
Local ยท Ollama2,240$0
This week ยท org-wide+12.0pp tasks resolved vs. unoptimised baseline

Cost without outcome is just a number. Alongside spend, the dashboard shows what it produced: tasks completed, turns per task, and time saved. The same metrics from the benchmark proof below, now running on your own repos.

The proof

The measured impact of LemonCrow

Same model, same tasks, same limits, only then with LemonCrow added. Here's what happens:

92.8%

tasks resolved

vs 80.8% baseline

+12.0pp

more tasks completed

same model

37.7%

fewer turns

for the same work

23.7%

faster

start to finish

Cost came down 29.5% in that same run โ€” not the headline number, just what happens naturally when the agent stops repeating itself.

Tested on real, large codebases โ€” a full rebuild of a 1.24M-symbol repository indexes in about 3 min, and stays fast to search after that.

Read the full methodology and raw results โ†’

Ready when you are

See it work on your own codebase

No sales deck first. We run it against your repos and show you the numbers โ€” same as the benchmarks above, but yours.

Measured on your repositories, against your own baseline. No commitment to start.